Monday, 22 July 2013

Uganda is not ready for a National Airline

In recent weeks, there have been press reports about the revival of the Uganda Airlines. I was the last chairman of Uganda airlines and I would not want to mince words about this and the revival of Uganda airlines is not something I would support now. There are reports that since the airline was closed, traffic has increased. Yes indeed traffic has increased but that does not favor a Uganda based airline yet. We are lucky, we have Air Uganda to look at. Air Uganda is funded by Aga Khan and is not short of money. Uganda is technically short of money and starting an airline is not something I would recommend for the Ugandan airline. There are four reasons why.

One, Uganda’s economy is still small, even in the region it does not have the capacity to hold an airline. You could argue that Rwanda a much smaller economy has an airline, yes it does but looking at its financial performance, I know it is struggling. If I am not mistaken, recently it was in the papers either seeking government support or having received government support. Airline business requires numbers and the volume at Entebbe is still so small and is not about to grow substantially unless oil comes. Just because of the size of the economy, we can’t run an airline. We do not have the numbers. Kenya and Tanzania have a bit of tourism which attracts visitors. Kenya has had the advantage of the economic stability which nobody in the region has had. While Tanzania has always been politically stable, experiments with socialism reduced its economic stability.  During the Idi Amin period, even the little industry that we had walked across the border. Kenya’s industrial base is the biggest in the region and with tourism, the economy can beef up the numbers of an airline.

This leads me to the second reason. This is historical. The East African airways which was jointly owned by Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda was one of Africa’s airline. This was closed in 1977 when Kenya got tired of Idi Amin and decided to break the community. At the time, Kenya took the decision to take all the planes and the routes. Idi Amin decided then to establish Uganda airlines. There was no way Uganda would compete with Kenya airways, they had the planes, the experience in management, there were more politically stable and Uganda had been isolated. The airline business has been designed like many other things to favor the developed countries and it definitely favors those who have an airline and those who are strong traders.  Countries have agreements with one another to allow their airlines to fly into their respective countries, so when Uganda signs an agreement with a country say Britain, it allows the specific British National airline to land in Uganda correspondingly Uganda is allowed to land a specific national airline to land in the U.K.  This is a cup of tea for the airlines in the developed countries. They have the planes, what do they do? They pass a law not allowing planes that make a lot of noise in their countries. Most third world countries have old planes that make a lot of noise. They pass a law that does not allow airlines that emit carbon dioxide. 3rd world countries have these types of planes. They require you to have a visa three months before you travel and for the ordinary people, you have to show you have land, a family, a job and possibly children before you get a visa. If you are buying a ticket from the developed countries, you will find a cheap ticket, if you buy a ticket from the developing countries, the cost is always very high.  The big airlines worldwide negotiate contracts with oil companies, British airways for instance with over 350 planes on almost 300 destinations, 2000 flights a week, tankers fuel at 60cents per liter. This is based on their volume. Your Uganda airlines will tanker fuel at 1.5 dollars per litre. How can airline compete ins such circumstances? Unless if it going to Arua or Kasese. I recall that even when Uganda airlines was operating, because it had one plane, Kenya airways made sure Uganda airlines flew without passengers. They would schedule their flight 15mins before or after the Uganda airlines flight. Since Uganda airlines had one plane and at times it would delay, people preferred to fly Kenya airways.

Management is the third reason I would advise the revival of Uganda airlines. Today Uganda has no strong local bank and yet we have billionaires around. Unfortunately the local billionaires with exception of our leading Business men who have earned their fortune the hard way do not make this money through business. It is said that some politicians in the country are stinking rich but have never run a business. The point is there is no Uganda public enterprise that is not faced with management problems, real or imaginary. It seems all we do is waiting for these managers to make mistakes and push them down. Of course there are cases of mistakes or actual Impropriety, the history of Uganda’s public enterprise is that if you are one, you are waiting to be scandalized in one way or the other, it is not surprising that most of the multi-nationals have foreign CEOs. These companies do not yet have confidence in Ugandan managers. Of course they are also many areas where they have no skills, tourism, catering is staffed by Kenyans and Ethiopians. So who will manage this airline and may work so well but at the end of the day leave frustrated or be forced out. I pay tribute to those managers who manage Uganda’s enterprises successfully.

The last reason I would not recommend to the airline is the cost involved. There are various ways of funding an airline. If you have the money, you can purchase the equipment. Companies like emirates do this. If you do not have, you can lease a plane. There is an individual in Ireland who had over 400 planes but he did not have an airline, he would simply just lease them out. You need to by good equipment in sufficient numbers but like I said in the beginning, Uganda does not have that money technically and if you are poor the financiers will screw you. You see what money lenders do to people in the local market. If the numbers existed, you could lease planes but since the numbers do not exist, I would not recommend establishing an airline.


However, if we are smart enough, the cargo business is good business. Cargo planes do not have the fuss the passenger planes have. Dutch air was successful because it was primarily in cargo. That would be a good start for Uganda airlines. When the oil flows and the numbers can come in and we can fix our tourism and improve our labour productivity, have our managers gain international repetition, then we can go for the airline. But as of now, an airline in Uganda is a stillbirth.

7 comments:

  1. I think this makes sense,Uganda need to reconsider .It is not just having the pride of owning one but the benefits accrued in the feasibility study.carry out more research before it become another embarrassment.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Professor,Yes u hav apoint but,i would like to differ with u on this especially the bit when ur talk of Uganda's Economy being small.On the contrary the economy is over 10 times more powerful than it was in the 60's during the Uganda Airlines times.Due to lack of its own airline,Uganda has lost thousands of tourists to its neighbours.Yet tourism is one sector that can catapult this economy soon than later.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It makes great sense, calling every individual in the key decision position to think broadly before making any decision. however i would like to point out that in this current time we do not need to carry the old song of why Uganda Airlines failed and try to put it into the same pot of the new airline. In this, time where competition is taking a great stride in determining winning strategies, Uganda needs to be much smarter than all the other guys in the field. yes, our economy is not performing so well, that does not mean we can fail to run and manage an airline. Prof Waswa used to tell us to have this mind set "... think out of the box" can i ask you Prof to have a positive mind set and know it is possible for Uganda Airlines to fly higher again.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with the professor. We cant simply demand for an airline out of jingoistic crescendo. Like Hon.Minister for Tourism Wildlife & Heritage Maria Mutagamba said at the recently concluded Routes Africa Conference held in Kampala, we need to invest more in airports rather than airlines. Look how many times Sabena, SN Brussels then Brussels Airlines changed their name for reasons I'd rather leave them to explain. Let us draw from The deregulation Act of 1978 in USA that opened the skies therefore removing barriers to competition. As a result, the price of air travel reduced drastically. Since then several mergers like Air France and KLM, United and American have occurred .This has ostensibly reduced operational costs that creations like Uganda Airlines would not solve ,notwithstanding the costs of purchasing and maintaining aircraft that Professor Balunywa already alluded to.
    The focus as well should be to allow the opening budget airlines. We need adapt such policies that will reduce the cost of flying within the region as was the case with budget airlines in Europe such as like Easy Jet and Ryan Air.
    For those who simply wish to simply throw a coat of paint the national Colors on any ‘flying elephant’ and a white one I must add , forget!, after all we have failed to manage our ground transportation; all pock marked with potholes and floods, with those rowdy boda bodas riding on the wrong side of the road and the distressed oil tanker ,waiting to explode.
    For now lets support or partner with ‘Air Uganda’ that is managed and backed by financially muscled The Aga Khan.Perhaps make an IPO on the Stock Exchange so we are stakeholders in this,our 'Air Uganda'. Otherwise we would wind up with another septuagenarian General Manager,a recycled crony who last diligently served in East African Airlines when the telex was today’s tablet.

    ReplyDelete
  5. We cannot avoid reflecting on the challenges Uganda Airlines faced that led to its collapse. I do not see any significant change in the factors at play now (and not previously at play then) that will positively favor a new Uganda Airlines. I believe this is another of those good ideas to have but the reality of its success is extremely remote.

    Air travelers have become even more sophisticated and reliability of air services drive their decisions to a very great extent. Air travel has also become much of a network business as opposed to relying on one or only a few destinations. Kenya Airways has also been successful because of its vast African network. South African Airways and Ethiopian Airlines also command superior network advantage built over a long period of time. The maintenance capability and international standards expected from an airline is extremely costly and would call for a thorough assessment of our commitment to how far we can be technically competitive.

    I entirely agree with Prof Balunywa's observations... I have not even heard or read from anywhere that the assets of former Uganda Airlines including the ENHAS handling department, Galileo Global Distribution System, the many houses in various parts of Kololo and Entebbe will be surrendered by the people these were "allocated" to... I want to hear uncle Sam's voice on this new proposal...

    What we need now is to develop key regional air strips to levels where they can handle and attract international operations.... Supposing Kasese, Jinja, Gulu, Soroti and Arua are upgraded to handle external flights then promoting such destinations would be the next best obligation to improve tourism and develop further economic opportunities. We could also partner with Air Uganda stakeholders (Agakhan) to improve on the capacity of Air Uganda (if we must)...

    On a light note, since the World Bank was at the fore front of causing Uganda Airlines to close then, are they now in favor of starting this new one? Davis Mugizi, one of the former senior managers of Uganda Airlines died mysteriously advocating against the intended closure of the airline then. Even a one-page report has never been published on the circumstance in which he was killed in cold blood at his home..

    ReplyDelete
  6. You are all right but the Government is still having alot to do . we should focus on improving and developing on what we have and we focus on others next .

    Nkusi Gerald

    ReplyDelete
  7. Though aviation is a costly Industry in terms of operation, regulation compliance, training and staffing etc, many people's minds have been wired to view this vibrant industry through a different lens ignoring the many positive attributes it offers.
    With the inflow of new foreign scheduled carriers into Entebbe in the likes of Fast jet(Tanzania),Fly Dubai(UAE low cost airline) and Etihad (UAE), the future of aviation industry in Uganda is promising. The discovery of oil and the tourism industry boom are some of the major contributing factors attracting these foreign aviation players.
    For Uganda to have an equally competitive share both in the oil and tourism boom, it has to effectively use this opportune time to organize its aviation sector in order for it to be on the same footing with regional and international players.

    A national carrier will promote a sense of national pride. Ugandans have a very strong sense of national identity. This prestige is evident in all the international engagements the country participates in. Its something that is deeply rooted in their hearts and minds and culminates in the unanimous spirit that Ugandans exhibit at all levels be it in sports , music, education, health, peace etc. It is a national property that would unify all Ugandans and something that they stand to be proud of. Am sure every Ugandan living in the diaspora would want to take a flight back home in one of his/her own carrier.

    Most countries' national airlines even though have not reached profitability, are operated for strategic reasons. A case in point is a land locked and mountainous country such as Ethiopia. Most land locked countries would want economic independence and transport self sustainability.

    In addition many national carriers are still languishing in the loss bracket and continue to operate in the loss margins because of the spill-over benefit they offer to nationals. As I write now, KQ (Kenya airways) is limping profit-wise, grappling with frequent Staff strikes , high maintenance costs and high cost of fuel, big debts owed to the aircraft manufacturers from whom they acquired Dream-liners (B788) and Boeing Tripple Sevens (B773s) and additional B738s.But they are not relenting because this airline provides a number of jobs to Kenyans, it contributes immensely to their tourism industry, it has contributed highly to JKIA's aviation hub status in terms of volumes of Cargo and passenger load factors.
    There are a lot of business successes linked to the existence and operation of a national airline.
    As we talk , Rwanda has already finalized plans with Airbus for the acquisition of A333 and a relatively similar version A332 and also a B738 shortly joining their fleet late September , November and early Next year respectively. This fleet expansion is in response for their expansion program for Long-haul flight destination to Mumbai and New Delhi. The Million dollar question is, where on earth does this country,with a third the size of Uganda's GDP get the monies to finance this Airline? Rwandair has greatly and still supports its tourism sector. Kigali is now slowly transitioning into a destination for international conferences. A sneak look into this years international conference schedule displayed on the Rwanda conventional Bureau website (http://www.rcb.rw/mice-calendar-events/ ) shows Kigali by the end of this year will have hosted 13 international conferences with over 16,000 international delegates. These delegates alone will have spend their monies in Rwanda. And its most likely that many will fly into Kigali on board Rwandair.
    It would be unfair to conclude that Uganda airlines fell due to bad debts alone and leave out the many contributory factors leading to its fate such as poor management, lack of strategic planning in terms of fleet and routes management, non payment of air fees by government officials and many inefficient management tendencies. These factors could and can still be curtailed with an efficient management.

    ReplyDelete