To solve our own problems, we must first define what it means to be African

I like the piece below by Daniel Kalinaki that appeared in the monitor of Thursday April 10, 2014. He is wondering why African countries beg when they have so much wealth and so much potential. He wonders why Nigeria which is so wealthy goes to beg for money from developed countries. He also indicates that in Nigeria some people had stolen USD 10 billion and the Nigerian President had gone out to share in the 28 billion euro promised by the European Union to spend on Africa. Daniel goes on to describe challenges of leadership and other related matters. In these leadership issues, he wonders why France to sort out the mess in Mali while Nigeria the next door simply looks on. It is true we should not beg as African countries because we have the wealth but on the other hand, we have to beg because the global circumstances we are in makes us beggars. As Africans, we cannot win this war of emerging out of poverty. A very interesting story on South Africa appears in the New African of April 2014 number 538. South Africa like many other African countries are in a catch 22 situation. The decision we take is either we lose or they win. Daniel, read that article, it may give you an insight on how policy is administered in Africa. 

    To solve our own problems, we must first define what it means to be African Why do we Africans and our leaders allow ourselves the constant indignity of going abroad to beg when we have so much wealth and so much potential? It is hard not to return to that question every time the question of Africa’s poverty and vulnerability is raised, as it was at the European Union-Africa Union Summit in Brussels last week. The conventional wisdom – that we are poor – does not explain the underlying notion of why we are poor, and whether we really are poor. We might be the poorest people in the world but Africa is not a poor continent. From the oil fields of Libya to the mines in South Africa to the lush fertile soils of East Africa to the forests of Central Africa; we are not lacking in resources. The quality of our leaders, or the lack of it, offers a more viable explanation. Take for instance, the sight of President Goodluck Jonathan joining the Begging Brigade in Brussels seeking to share in the €28 billion that the EU promised to spend in Africa over the next six years. This is a leader whose corrupt government officials have stolen $10 billion of Nigeria’s oil money in just a couple of years. If Nigeria put this money in an Africa Fund, it would not go from a beggar to a lender overnight. That President Jonathan, begging hat in hand, does not see this or does but is unable to do anything about it, says a lot about his incompetence. Yet this begs a subsequent question; why do we have incompetent leaders in Africa? We have not always been this way. Our pre-colonial era is littered with examples of visionary leaders and elaborate government structures. Our independence and post-independence movements gave birth to visionary leaders, from Kwame Nkrumah to Julius Nyerere, Patrice Lumumba to Abdel Nasser Gamal. Why is it that today we have the likes of Teodore Obiang Nguema, the thieving dictator of Equatorial Guinea? How could South Africa have gone from the selflessness of Nelson Mandela to the selfishness of Jacob Zuma? One suspects that the problem could be a lack of a unifying ideology among our leaders and us. For all the claims to African solutions to African problems, we only claim our African identity in relation to outsiders, not in relation to ourselves. Thus while we are Africans abroad, we become Ugandans, Kenyans, Somali when we return to the continent, and narrow ourselves even further within our boundaries by seeking the warm, familiar embrace of the tribe. The Lord’s Resistance Army rebels killed and maimed people for decades but no one came to intervene because the victims weren’t African; they were Ugandans. We watched Somalia implode and slide into anarchy in the same way we now watch the Central African Republic or Mali but there is no inclination to lift a finger because they are Somalis or Fulani. Our problem is not that we fight too many wars in Africa, but that we fight the wrong wars – small civil wars over meagre State resources, instead of big regional wars to redraw borders, united people, and build empire. Why does it take France to sort out the mess in Mali when Nigeria, next door, simply looks on, its military leaders too bloated with graft to deal with Boko Haram? The Africa that seeks to deal with the world is an artificial and unsustainable construct of tribal tensions locked up in nation-states. We must put our empty claims to sovereignty aside and define a pan-African set of values and ideology. It is the only way to overcome the residual indignity of the leader of a country as big, rich and proud as the Congo, going to beg from its colonial master – a small country best known for a small statue of a small boy holding a small thing.

Effective Board Performance

Will Uganda move towards a knowledge Economy? Not just yet!!!!

For the last 50 years i have seen people use the hoe as the basic instrument to cultivate their land. In the last three years I have owned an iPhone and iPad and a samsung galaxy. Fortunately for me, i got the samsung from my friend Bitature and the iPad and iPhone from a friend in the USA. If it was not them my employer MUBS would have had to but i
The phone for me and I guess the ipad. The hoe costs less than $5 and the iphone is in tne region of $ 1,000!!!! The hoe is basic iron from the industrialization era and the phone are knoweldge products. No wonder apple Computers the makers of the iphone and ipad had at one time more money in their bank accounts than the US government. The fellas wreckin dollars and we wreck in poverty. How do we expect to turn our fortunes around as developing nations if we don’t give priority to the development of knowledge. Last year MUBS staff won grants from government for research. A year later the money has never been disbursed!!!! If we don't put importance to research then how can we develop knowledge?

In my presentation i reviewed the models by Solow and Romer  two economist who talked about knowledge and research and development as the  additional requirements to labour and capital in the equation to  fast track economic growth. The industrial revolution transformed western countries from agrarian economies to industrial ones. Development of technology has enabled these countries to move from industry based to service based and in recent years to information based. The information based economy is the knowledge based economy.

But how does Uganda or other developing countries get there? These countries cannot develop similar technologies as the west or the other developing countries have done. They don't have the human resource let alone the money to do it. Singapore and Malaysia tried a home based model, they achieved a great deal but earned the wrath of the developed countries who called their leaders dictators. But sustaining that growth has only been through opening to western technologies. This way these counties have joined the mainstream world economics. Without those dictators this change in these countries would not have happened. My prescription is very simple. First of all we have to get people to. Know they are poor and it’s important that they get out of that condition. In the literature of change management we call this  a compelling need for change. Probably this is the most difficult. It is at times referee to as change in mind set. I have heard this word around for so long  that i am not sure what it means any more. How do i get the 80% of the people in Uganda who leave in the rural areas to see the need for change. The next is make them work a little more for those already working and those who are not to make them  see the need to work and actually work. This increase in production would then be followed up with increase in productivity. Tough not so. Changing the 100 year old hoe!!! With more production produced efficiently you have  something to sell especially outside your country. Uganda i guess can feed its neighbors only if was able to produce more and more cheaply. Its at this stage that adoption of more advanced technologies would be necessary. Technology can be used in production and logistics management, but there must be something to manage!!!
The leapfrog in technology usage provided by mobile technology gives an indication of what  is possible. Technology would lead to more efficient production and this should move the population away from agriculture. Industry in these countries will never move to heavy industry.  That should be left to the advanced countries.

 
Funding research should receive some priority. I am surprised that our research is in products like cassava,  matooke !!! What benefit will cassava research add to the country? If it is in how to convert cassava into manufactured products i would go with it. But to provide better yield for consumption is a lost cause!!! What products can we get out of cassava or matooke is ok but how to produce it better is not a research matter. Matooke is one of the things that are so cumbersome to produce and cook. A bunch of matooke tales 18 months to be harvested and is eaten in one meal by a group of about 10  people.  In 18 months you will produce possibly three crops of maize!!! If you look at an acre of matooke and acre of maize. I think you will go for maize. Good matooke and i must assure you I love matooke, takes over 6 hours to cook. This is energy you are spending. It is no surprise, poor people growing matooke and cooking it for those many hours!! They cannot emerge from poverty!!! They can never transform into a knowledge economy. Knowledge economy for Uganda  Not Just Yet