Saturday, 30 August 2014
Monday, 4 August 2014
Africa losing 58 billion dollars annually
It seems we are condemned to
poverty. It is us the poor who lose to
the rich. According to a group of organisations including Health Poverty Action,
the African Forum and network on Debt and Development and the World Development
Movement among others, USD 192 billion is flowing out of the African continent
every year in profits made by foreign companies through tax evasion (Paul
Redfan, a special correspondent of the East African newspaper, issue of July
26-august 1, 2014).
In contrast USD 134 billion flows
into the continent in form of loans, foreign investment and aid. The result is
Africa is losing USD 58 billion a year. The report claims that this loss is not
only repatriation of profits but illicit financial flows, illegal logging and
fishing among other things. The report says that Africa is forced to say a
further USD 10.6 billion to adapt to the effects of climatic change that it did
not cause. Mr. Martin Drewey, the Director
of Poverty Health Action describes it as looting. He says “let us use more
accurate language. It is sustained looting the opposite of generous giving.”
When you do not have income and the little you have is siphoned away, you are
condemned to poverty. It is not surprising that there is a school of thought
that says that poor Africans should be given money rather than let them work.
Is Africa’s leadership aware of this challenge?
Is Africa really growing as it has been claimed?
Razia Khan writing in the east
African Business week of June 30-Jly 6, 2014, questioned whether Africa was
really growing. His argument was that the statistics quality in Africa from
different agencies did not enable Africa to know whether it was growing or not.
According to him, the data in Africa is so bad that it does not enable any
meaningful interpretation. Khan is head of Africa research at Standard
Chartered bank in London. In a way he is challenging the school or thought that
Africa has been growing rapidly in the last decade. I cannot agree with him
more, poverty in Africa is simply increasing. Possibly we have economic growth
without economic growth. Many world leaders and economists have been saying it
is time for Africa to lead the way in economic growth following China. My view
is that Africa is not ready yet. The concept of business is still foreign to
many Africans given that approximately 70% or more of Africans are not yet in
the business/industrial economy.
There is need to spend money on agriculture, are we spending it rightly?
In the Summit Business Review of
January 4, 2014, there was an article that claimed that the Ministry of
Agriculture was to spend shs 140 billion on implementing a national fertilizer
strategy in Uganda. This was because government had noted that there was a need
to boost the soils to improve agricultural production. When you talk about implementing
a policy in government, the money normally goes to allowances. The newspaper
report on NAADS indicate most of the most has gone into seminars and
allowances. Seminars and allowances are indeed part of what is required to
implement a policy the issue is simply how much is spent on getting actual
results of the policy. According to the Summit Business Review, this
expenditure was a wrong priority. Agriculture is the main stay of this economy.
How should it be supported to grow. This is a question for others to contribute
answers too.
Fred Muhumuza an economist with
KPMG Uganda said with the Monitor of June 12, 2014 “that planning in Uganda is so scrappy as the President noted with
NAADS(call it agriculture) where the bulk of money goes into workshops and
seminars mostly allowances”. The President is possibly still doing more
analysis and will soon add other ministries, departments and agencies of
government.
What is preventing Uganda from growing? Burying the dead
It is said that in Kenya when an
ordinary person loses a relative they would store away the dead person until
the weekend. It is also said that if you are a factory worker in Kenya and left
your job during a week day to go for burial, do not bother to come back because
you would have already been replaced. African culture has its wonderful
experiences but also it has its not so wonderful experiences. The not so
wonderful experiences act as constraints to business. burying the dead is one
of them. I have a friend of mine who lived in the U.K and his father lived in
Germany. We used to meet every January for almost 10 years. One time he told me
he thought his father was dead and I asked him why. He said he did not receive
a Christmas card from him! Such is the attitude to death in many developed
countries contrary to what is in the developing countries. In Uganda to
understand death, you must watch Bukedde TV. Our culture has immense respect
for the dead and the need to attend burials. If a big man dies in this country
say at the level of permanent secretary, you may have about 300 vehicles at the
burial ceremony irrespective of the distance. This is a huge unproductive cost
to the economy but on the other hand, culture demands that this be done. If you
were a politician or anybody of substance, with some link to the dead person
and you do not show up, you will be seen in bad light. It is not surprising
that recently President Museveni, shared his frustration with investors over
the too much time Ugandans lose mourning and burying the dead. Sometime in June
at the Imperial Royale Hotel while addressing investors in the country, he said
investors had to suffer the problem of wastage of time which was embedded in
Ugandans culture. He gave examples of burials as one of the time wasters and
called for changing attitudes of Ugandans. He said Ugandans were not taking up
top jobs because of some of these cultures which made them inefficient. This
contributes to my thinking that in Uganda business and industry is still a
foreign concept. We yet have to appreciate it and give it its due value
Saturday, 2 August 2014
Government never dies..
Recently an article appeared in
the papers talking about that we had too many institutions. In an industry,
there should be no barrier to startup of institutions. This promotes a competitive
spirit and allows provision of better and cheaper services to the customers. Universities
in Uganda and indeed secondary schools have taken this dimension. For secondary
schools, the demand exists and the supply cannot be any better than what we
have. The good schools like Kampala Parents are charging a premium. The 3rd
world schools also charge what is affordable in their respective markets. For universities,
the shakeout will come more quickly like what is happening in the banking
system. Universities will close if they cannot offer efficient services.
Of course some may try to hold on
politically but customers vote with their feet. If you service is mediocre and
your service charge is too high, they will definitely go away.
However in government, there is a
luxury of being able to open up any new institutions and even if the performance
mediocre, it will survive, government never dies. Recently, the government of
Uganda proposed the establishment of African Graduate Entrepreneurship Institute.
The artistic impression of the proposed Centre is here.
MUBS initiated the teaching of
entrepreneurship not only in the country but in the region. We offer programmes
in entrepreneurship including PhDs. We are the best in this. However when government
opens a unit like this and we have no idea, nor input not even consulted, it
seems the right hand does not know what the left hand is doing.
Our existing institutions are
poorly funded. We need to strengthen what we have before we venture into
others. Portfolio entrepreneurs open a multiplicity of businesses with numerous
objectives in mind. At times they take time to explore their core competencies.
At times they see an opportunity and open a business for a short term to
exploit that. For instance, it is opportunistic for a bank to go into insurance
(though in Uganda, this has been prohibited). It is also opportunistic for a
big trading company to start an insurance business. The motivations are not
very clear unless if they are political.
Government should have strengthened the entrepreneurship education and
training function other than opening new institutions with no capacity to
manage them in a technical sense.
The human resource to manage such
an institution can only come from MUBS at the academic level. However we watch
the space and see what will happen to the institute. Government is not short of
solutions.
Friday, 1 August 2014
Africans cannot do business, not just yet
Africans cannot do business, not just yet
I am responding to Timothy
Kalyegira’s interesting article when he wonders why Africans cannot succeed
like Indians or whites in business. in another article by Andrew Mwenda in the
Independent, he wondered whether Africa will be the next big thing in terms of
economic growth. These two people, Kalyegira and Mwenda are journalists I
respect for their knowledge and objectivity over the years. Not that I do not
respect others but to me they have proven themselves. One of the key things
about their writings is that they are informed, they are researched.
Poverty and jobs are on
everybody’s lips as one of the biggest challenges that Africa has. I will pose
a silly question, do Africans know they are poor? Many Africans are comfortable
and pleased with themselves with their state. They are happy to have their
extended families and eat the communal food that they eat and live day to day.
Indeed, negative literature about Africa, has said that all Africans do is make
noise, have sex and produce children. They has been these articles circulating
about what former South African President Botha said and what the Israel Prime
Minister Netanyahu
has been saying about Arabs and Africans. Netanyahu’s
attitude towards Barack Obama is well known. Invariably, Europeans get
surprised by the conduct of Africans and of course I must add Arabs in this
category. They will also be surprised at the business attitude and practices if
both Indians and Arabs.
My proposition is Africans cannot
do business, not just yet. It is foreign to them. The concept of business
emerged in the western world following the industrial revolution. At that time,
the west had to transform from the feudal society to one where the peasants had
to work in factories to live. Around the same time in Europe, there was a
period of renaissance, a period of enlightenment, education and training
emerged as part of life. The socialization of west was transformed from the
feudal society to an industrialized society. Majority of the population in
Africa, still live in rural areas and depend on subsistence farming. A small
number of these who become urbanized or educated, attempt to go into business.
indeed they are very good civil servants because the training makes them that
but they are not good businessmen because they do not have that training. They
do not have that socialization. Their socialization continues to be one of the
extended family and happiness sought in having children, and belonging to a
society. To be able to get where they are, the developed countries have gone
through tremendous change. The world wars killed millions of peoples. The civil
wars in the United States, the Bolshevik revolution in Russia among others were
part of the transformation process. Reading books like the Grapes of Wroth will
explain to you the transformation of countries like the United States from a
feudal society to a modern industralised society. Unfortunately this has not
happened in Africa. Business is foreign to Africans. As long as there is a
fallback position of family, friends and even political massaging, Africans
cannot take business as a way of life. We need a revolution that will transform
African societies to prepare it for business. We need the insecurity that is
created by the factory system where if you have no job, you will not live. It
is only then that Africa will wake up and compete with the Asian and European
communities in business.
Timothy, to me this explains why
in many Africans countries, it is the Indian, Chinese or the European that is
commanding business. they have been socialized to know that without an economic
activity there will be no future.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)